Jeff Sutherlin, Associate Broker, MBA

Jeff Sutherlin
Office: Kyrene
Office Phone: 480-539-4775
Direct Phone: 480-539-4775
Fax: 480-539-4795
Email: jeff@ubgrealestate.com
Website: http://ubgrealestate.com


About Me:
President and Principal of United Brokers Group.  National Certified Trainer for “Fierce Conversations” - Achieved top 5% in sales for Phoenix National homebuilder - Former Branch Manager for National Real Estate Company - Former Candidate for Gilbert Arizona Town Council - US Navy Veteran - B.A. University of Arizona - MBA University of Phoenix - Former member Board of Directors Goodwill Industries of Central Arizona - Testing for Black belt in Kempo Karate in ‘10 - Former Supply Chain Manager for largest chip maker on earth - Resides in Gilbert, Arizona with his wife Alex and their two children.  I love to spend time with my family helping them succeed in life and sports.

Articles by Jeff Sutherlin

Chilling Effect on Short Sales Unless New Bill Passes

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 @ 02:03 PM

This is an article written by a well respected real estate attorney in Phoenix, Chris Combs with the Combs Law Group, P.C.

Chilling Effect on Short Sales Unless New Bill Passes

by:  Chris Combs, Esq.

The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 (“2007 Act”) provides for an exemption for any income tax on debt forgiveness for money used to purchase, or make improvements to, a principal residence. This 2007Act is scheduled to expire January 1, 2013. If there is no extension of this 2007 Act, a seller will pay income tax on the amount of the debt forgiveness by a lender in a short sale. For example, if a homeowner with a $250,000 mortgage does a short sale for $150,000, the homeowner will have to pay income tax on the amount of the $100,000 debt forgiveness.

On March 19, 2012, Representative Charles Rangel (D-NY), the sponsor of the 2007 Act, introduced a new bill HR 4202, Mortgage Cancellation Relief Act of 2012 (“proposed 2012 Act”). This proposed 2012 Act is basically one sentence extending the January 1, 2013, expiration date of the 2007 Act for two years until January 1, 2015.

Seems simple, but politics are involved. See my email E-Blast dated 3/13/12 where I noted, among other things, that the current Speaker of the House, John Boehner, voted against the passage of the 2007 Act. Furthermore, although all of the other Democrats besides Rep. Rangel on the House Ways and Means Committee are co-sponsors of the proposed 2012 Act, none of the 22 Republicans on the House Ways and Means Committee agreed to be a co-sponsor. Therefore, the chances of passing the two-year extension are problematic. In fact, the website www.govtrack.us, which tracks the passage of Congressional legislation, states that “we think this bill has a 9% chance of passing Congress.”

If there is no passage of the proposed 2012 Act, or any other extension of the current debt forgiveness law, there will be a chilling effect on the recovering housing market. The number of short sales will be significantly reduced. Many “underwater” homeowners will continue to make their mortgage payments and hope that the value of their home eventually appreciates to the amount of their mortgage, rather than do a short sale and pay a significant tax bill.

If you would like assistance regarding commercial or residential transactions, financing, potential litigation, bankruptcy, HOA issues, estate planning or other legal matters, please call our office at 602.957.9810 and arrange for an initial consultation with one of our real estate attorneys.

Happy MLK Day: MLK, a Transformational Leader

Monday, January 16, 2012 @ 07:01 AM

Arizona’s Top 10 Most Dangerous Short Sale Myths

Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 04:01 PM

Top 10 Most Dangerous Short Sale Myths

Myth 1: Arizona is a non-recourse state.
While there are laws that protect the homeowner from deficiency in a foreclosure or deed-in-lieu, these laws do not apply in a short sale. Only an experienced real estate attorney, after reviewing all loan documents, deeds-of-trust and short sale documents can properly ascertain that liability. As a Realtor you should NEVER give advice as to the homeowner’s potential for deficiency liability. Even if that advice is technically correct, some lenders may file lawsuits regardless of the merits of the case, knowing that a certain percentage of borrowers will pay just to avoid going to court. Additionally, homeowners will often make incorrect statements as to the nature of their loans. Currently, we find about 60% of our clients are incorrect as to the nature of their loans which affects the potential for anti-deficiency protection. If a borrower is sued by their lender, there is a reasonable chance they will file a suit against the Realtor that handled the short sale. These suits can be difficult to defend, even if the Realtor made no representations as to the homeowners potential liability resulting from a short sale. For more information on deficiency liability read our article and blog on this subject.
*
Myth 2: Referring a homeowner to an attorney removes the liability from the Realtor.
If that homeowner does not retain the attorney, the protection for the Realtor is limited. Referring a homeowner to an attorney that represents the Realtor’s company can also leave a disgruntled seller with a legitimate complaint relating to who was being represented by the attorney and the fact that the attorney had a conflict of interest. A written legal opinion as to the homeowner’s potential for a deficiency lawsuit from a qualified, independent attorney provides the Realtor the most protection against a lawsuit arising from deficiency issues.
*
Myth 3: It is okay to tell a seller they should get behind on their house payments in order to qualify for a short sale. It is never okay to give the seller this advise. Seller(s) should be encouraged to contact their lender(s) to determine what the qualifications for a short sale are for them given their circumstances and lender.
*
Myth 4: Lenders lose more on foreclosures than short sales.
Since the lender may be protected by mortgage insurance or may have sold a loan into pools, the investor may receive more sales proceeds through a foreclosure at a lower sale price than through a short sale. In a foreclosure, the senior note holder (investor) gets paid before junior tranch holders are paid. This could result in a better payout for the senior note holder as a result of foreclosure (the senior note holder carries the majority vote on decisions related to this loan). Lenders also use NPV (Net Present Value) calculations to determine their best option. This takes into consideration many factors that consider the economic interests only of the lender/investor. Hence, the reason that lenders/investors will sometimes make decisions to foreclose that seem on the surface not to make sense is often the result of the NPV test.
*
Myth 5: It is possible to have the lender report a short sale as paid in full as agreed on credit.
Although this has happened in a very few cases last year; the reality is that lawsuits by lenders on the new loans against previous lenders that did not report short sales have quickly put an end to this option. On rare occasions this may be negotiated if a forensic audit turns up a serious violation.
*
Myth 6: I should advertise myself as a short sale expert.
Although this may look good in advertising, it can quickly backfire on the Realtor. By calling yourself an expert you are held to a higher standard; that of a true “expert”. Homeowners can claim they followed the advice of the Realtor because he/she claimed to be an expert and the Realtor will be evaluated at the higher standard of care.
*
Myth 7: If the borrower receives a 1099, the lender has taken their losses and will not pursue a deficiency judgment.
In the past it was accepted that the 1099 was an indication that the lender had written off the loan losses and would not pursue the borrower. However, lenders have sued borrowers years after that 1099 filing. In a recent appellate case (December 2009) of Amhurst Bank vs. Fossett the lender argued that they only file the 1099 because of federal accounting requirements and it was not releasing the borrower from liability. That court did not make a decision but sent the case down to the lower court to decide. Lenders are working hard in all states to get the rules changed in order to recapture more of their losses.
*
Myth 8: Once a trustee sale is completed there is no way to reverse it.
It may be possible to unwind a foreclosure after the trustee sale has completed. However, this requires careful analysis of the lender’s actions and some proof of wrong doing on the part of the lender.
*
Myth 9: Borrower must be delinquent to get short sale approval.
We have seen some instances in which a short sale is completed without the borrower going delinquent. However, it is generally the case that lenders will not approve a short sale for a borrower that keeps their payments current. The flip side of this is that it creates more pressure on the Realtor to complete the short sale before the property goes to foreclosure. Usually lenders will extend trustee sale dates to facilitate a pending short sale, but not always. Increasingly, lenders are unwilling to extend short sale dates even with a valid offer pending on government loans.
*
Myth 10: Anti-deficiency laws do not apply to investment properties.
Although these laws are open for interpretation, the law simply states that the property must be “utilized”. There are several cases in which the courts have determined that renting is considered a utilization of the property for purposes of allowing anti-deficiency protection.

Have an amazing day!